Verification

The most interesting thing that we talked about last class was bias in news. I think that the news is often presented in a very biased form. I remember the clips of Anderson Cooper that we were watching a couple weeks ago. We talked about how he was very emotional in his presentation. I think the biggest thing wrong with that report was how biased it was. Yes, the people needed help; however, he didn't report anything that the government was doing to help. He simply ignored any facts that didn't go along with the story he wanted to present. I think that more than anything journalists need to keep themselves unbiased. http://www.journalism.org/resources/principles

I think that one of the most important points of verification is the principle of transparency.This means being open to your audience and showing them how and where you got your sources. The goal of journalists is to get information out to the public and have them make decisions about information. I we do not do this in a trustworthy way, we stop being credible. I found an article about peoples trust in the media compared to other places.  http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/little-trust-in-government-or-media-either/

I think that the internet poses a threat to the verification process. I think that many blogers think that it is more important to be fast than it is to be correct. Journalists need to be accurate and dependable or else people will go to other sources. I really liked the accuracy checklist that was shown in class. I think as news consumers we should encourage truth and accuracy in the news. If we don't read the fiction or embellished truth then they will stop writing it. http://businessjournalism.org/2010/10/29/how-to-build-a-personalized-accuracy-checklist/      

Journalism the profession

I have been thinking a lot about the anonymous quoting issue that we talked about in class last week. I think that in most situations it is silly to put an anonymous quote. In most stories you can quote someone without there being any problems for the source; however, there are situations that require anonymous sources. We talked about crime lords and political scandals as being appropriate situations for anonymous sources and I agree with this statement. I think that the more anonymous sources your story has the more unreliable it is. http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/columns/imperialcity/12025/

I was also thinking that before I took this class I'm pretty sure that all my inside information about the journalism profession was from Newsies, Harry Potter, and various movies. How sad is that. Now I love our man Denton and all, but really I don't think he counts as a credible journalist.

Oh Newsies, possibly the worst movie ever made. Anyway I was just thinking important it is for news agencies and journalists to let people know what they stand for as far as news quality and integrity goes. Journalists have a pretty bad reputation and it's important for us as news consumers to know that we can trust what we are taking in.  http://www.cjr.org/about_us/mission_statement.php

Pew Media Study

I thought that this article was very interesting. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/business/media/pew-media-study-shows-reliance-on-many-outlets.html?_r=1&src=tp I agreed with most of the information presented. I think that the younger generation are looking to new mediums for their news.

One thing that I think that the article didn't really talk about was that most people look to more than one source for news. My parents watch the news every night, they also read the newspaper every morning. On the other hand most of the younger generation simply read a couple of websites and call it a complete understanding of current news.

I think that this is going to cause problems in the future. The television news and printed news are geared towards two slightly different things, so you are getting slightly different information. You are also learning about a large range of things, meaning that you generally know what is going on in the community and world. The new generation however is simply reading what interests them. I think it is a problem that we aren't exposed to all of the news that our parents are. Whether that is because we simply haven't gotten there yet as far as age and maturity go or simply that the news industry is drastically changing I just don't know.

Journalism loyalty

I thought that class last time was very interesting. It was interesting to hear the idealist view of how journalists operate. I agree 100% that that is how it should work, however I don't think that is a reasonable statement that journalists are first loyal to the public.

I think especially where bloggers and other unchecked writers are concerned. Their first loyalty is to them self and their own statistic of hits to their blog. Most will stretch, manipulate, or make up facts to encourage people to read their blog.

 In the case of serious journalists who are working for major publications, yes they are loyal to the public. They are also accountable to their editors and it is rather simple for the public to check these facts and figures. http://blog.oregonlive.com/oregonianopinion/2008/01/sandra_duffy_journalisms_first.html

I remember a couple of classes ago one of the groups showed a clip from the new movie "Contagion". This movie was about an outbreak of a new disease. In it was portrayed a internet reporter and how he created mass hysteria by making outrageous claims about effective medicines and government conspiracy during a national crisis. In the end he was arrested and charged with crimes. 

I think that it is risky for the public to automatically assume that a all journalists are being totally objective. In this era of mass media and unlimited information we as the public need to constantly analyzing the information we are receiving.

Journalism equals truth... at least to the general public.

I agree with what the group said in their presentation last week. We expect journalists to report the truth. We as consumers of the news assume that because a story is published that it is 100% true. I think that is a huge mistake with todays media.

With the main stream news sources you can always assume that the facts have been checked, however more and more people are turning to alternative forms of news. Blogs and social media make getting news very simple and people are able to post their own views and opinions; however, not all of these posts are factual.

One of my favorite websites is called "The Onion". It is a website that creates totally fake news that is in the correct style and format. It honestly take about thirty seconds for you to realize that this stuff isn't real; it is a joke. They stick to current issues and I think it is interesting social commentary.

This picture is from an article that describes how in an effort to earn money for the US economy Obama appeared in a Japanese commercial.  The reason why I think "The Onion" is so interesting is because when you see an article or a news clip in the accepted style you assume that it is actually news. People have no common sense when reading the news. They take everything presented as hard fact. If you ran this story in The Daily Universe I think that most people would take it as fact. Very few people would question the information and write in about it. The whole story can be found at http://www.theonion.com/articles/obama-earns-money-for-us-by-appearing-in-japanese,21292/

The Future of News

 I think that the future of news is secure. It's unrealistic to predict that print news is going to disappear any time soon. After all, every time a new form of media has become popular the older form has had to adapt to survive. For example radio had to change significantly when television began to absorb its viewers. I think that Ryan Singel says it better than I ever could "Paper is dying, but it’s just a device, replacing it with pixels is a better experience." http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/03/the-future-of-n/
 
I agree with the group that presented; professional journalism will continue to lead our new craze of citizen journalism. People today are using professional journalists to point them in the direction of important news. They then write what they think about this story or add their own information on top of it. It is very rare for a blogger to come up with their own independent and original breaking news. I do think that news is returning to its roots. It began with citizens sharing their local news with each other, I think that with social media it is returning to this form. http://www.economist.com/node/18928416

I found this awesome clip where a bunch of important reporters and people in the news industry talk about the future of news and the citizen journalists. It is a little overly serious and pretentious, but I still think it is interesting. http://www.newseum.org/programs/future-of-news/index.html

What is Journalism?

To me journalism is reporting events or trends to a broad audience. My first real look into journalism came about because of September 11, 2001. The news anchors took the as much information as they could and shared it with the world. I think that for myself and the rest of the nation journalism changed in a specific way that day.
First and foremost the content of the news changed. According to PEJ Analysis reporting of foreign policy and terrorism has risen significantly since 2001.http://www.journalism.org/node/1839/print On top of what is reported I think that the method of reporting has changed as well. The most common methods were television and the newspaper. Now I think that most people go online for their news and are able to get news much faster.
Since there have been so many improvements in media I believe that more people are accessing and using these recourses. I think in the next decade journalism will be forced to change just as much if it hopes to stay a critical and vital source of information for the masses.
http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/viewArticle/1416/1521
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism